In a Chapter 15 case presenting interesting considerations for cross border lenders and borrowers, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas declined to implement in the United States the plan of reorganization that had been approved by a Mexican bankruptcy court in Vitro’s Mexican concurso mercantil proceeding, because the plan (i) did not provide for distributions to noteholders consistent with Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankrutpcy Code, (ii) did not sufficiently protect the interests of U.S. creditors, and (iii) did not protect the noteholders’ third-party claims against non-debtor subsidiaries, instead releasing those claims. The Texas bankruptcy court held that the distributions provided under the Mexican plan were not entitled to comity and the third-party releases were contrary to public policy of the United States. The decision has interesting implications which we discuss in this Client Update.

This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients and friends of the firm, is for general information only. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Please refer to the firm's privacy notice for further details.