DOJ Antitrust Division launches antitrust whistleblower rewards program

On July 8, 2025, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a whistleblower rewards program for criminal antitrust cases affecting the U.S. Postal Service. Individuals who provide original, nonpublic information that leads to at least $1 million in criminal antitrust fines or related recoveries may qualify to receive up to 30% of the criminal fines recovered.[1] DOJ’s goal is to “create a new pipeline of leads” by incentivizing “individuals to report specific, credible, and timely information about illegal agreements to fix prices, rig bids, and allocate markets, as well as other federal criminal violations that impact, distort, or undermine the competitive process or market competition.”[2]

Building upon its existing partnership in the Procurement Collusion Strike Force, the Antitrust Division has partnered with the U.S. Postal Service and the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Postal Service to pay out rewards under the program. The program’s requirements are set out in a memorandum of understanding between the agencies and include the following:

1. The information must be original, nonpublic, and not already known to the Division or U.S. Postal Service. It is also not original if obtained through a communication protected by the attorney-client privilege or obtained as part of a company’s compliance, internal audit, or investigation processes.
2. The following alleged violations of law presumptively qualify under the program:  a criminal violation of sections 1, 2, or 3 of the Sherman Act; a federal criminal violation committed to effectuate, facilitate, or conceal violations of the Sherman Act; a federal criminal violation targeting or affecting federal, state, or local public procurement; or a federal criminal violation targeting or affecting the conduct of federal competition investigations or proceedings.
3. Although the alleged violation must affect the “Postal Service, its revenues, or property,” the identifiable harm need not be material or otherwise pose any substantial detriment to the Postal Service.
4. To be eligible for an award, the individual reporting the alleged violation must not have “coerced another party to participate in the illegal activity” and cannot be “clearly the leader or originator of that activity.”
5. The individual must provide the information voluntarily (i.e., not pursuant to a preexisting obligation in connection with a criminal investigation or prosecution, a civil enforcement action, a formal demand, or an employer’s application to the Antitrust Division’s corporate leniency program). 

This initiative arrives less than a year after the Criminal Division’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program began offering similar rewards on forfeiture-based recoveries for corruption, financial institution, and private-payer healthcare crimes.[3] During the prior administration, former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco previewed DOJ’s approach to corporate compliance, signaling the issuance of a mix of carrots and sticks to incentivize compliance and proactive reporting of wrongdoing at the corporate and individual levels. She noted that these changes would include an expanded use of monetary incentives to ensure that violations are reported to DOJ.[4] The new program furthers that objective in the criminal antitrust space and underscores DOJ’s continued commitment to enforce the antitrust laws.

Key takeaways

There are a number of key considerations for companies in light of the Antitrust Division’s whistleblower rewards program.

• The new program is the latest example of DOJ’s wider strategy to identify conduct that violates the criminal antitrust laws.[5]
• The new program likely will lead to an increase in whistleblower reports of potential antitrust violations.
• It remains to be seen how the program will interact with, and whether it will impact, the Division’s Leniency Program.
• The new program encourages whistleblowers to report internally to the company’s compliance program before reporting to DOJ. Companies should therefore continue to evaluate their internal reporting functions and monitor how reports are documented and escalated.