Third Circuit Holds Non-Cash Consideration – Such As “No Authorized Generic” Agreements – Can Constitute Unlawful “Pay For Delay”
Client Memorandum

Created date


First appellate court decision applying FTC v. Actavis (S.Ct. 2013). Court finds rule of reason analysis should be applied where non-cash consideration - including agreement not to launch authorized generic - flows from patent holder to alleged infringer.