On June 20, 2013, the Supreme Court decided a case regarding waivers of class arbitration that could have potentially wide-ranging implications in antitrust and other cases. See American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest., Slip Op. No. 12-133 (S. Ct. June 20, 2013) (“AMEX III”). The case involved the question of whether a contractual arbitration provision waiving the right to arbitrate on a class basis is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), even when a plaintiff can demonstrate that the cost of prevailing on the claim in individual arbitration would likely exceed any potential recovery.

In a 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that the FAA’s strong mandate favoring arbitration was not overcome where arbitrating a federal antitrust claim on an individual basis would be prohibitively expensive. The Court reasoned that the antitrust laws evince no congressional command to bar class waivers.


This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients and friends of the firm, is for general information only. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Please refer to the firm's privacy notice for further details.