In November of 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) promulgated a rule that required a Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (“HSR Act”) filing when a transaction resulted in the transfer of “all commercially significant rights” to a pharmaceutical patent. Previously, no HSR filing was required if the licensor retained certain rights, such as the right to manufacture solely for the licensee. The FTC’s new rule reflected its conclusion that for purpose of evaluating the impact on competition of the transfer of pharmaceutical patent rights, the critical focus should be on whether the licensee received the right to direct all sales of and marketing efforts for the licensed product. On June 9, 2015, a D.C. Circuit panel held that the agency had acted within the scope of its authority in promulgating a rule which applied only to a particular industry. The court further held that the FTC had not acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner as had been alleged by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”) in its challenge to the new rule.

This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients and friends of the firm, is for general information only. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Please refer to the firm's privacy notice for further details.