Practice Mobile Menu Trigger Overview Experience Team Insights March 14, 2024 Client Update European Parliament approves AI Act On March 13, the European Parliament passed a draft of the Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act includes requirements f... February 13, 2024 Client Update U.S. Patent Office issues guidance for AI-assisted inventions On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued inventorship guidance for AI-assisted invention... December 27, 2023 Articles & Books What’s ahead when AI and intellectual property converge Davis Polk partner David Lisson and associate Serge Voronov authored “What’s ahead when AI and intellectual property c... November 29, 2023 Client Update Three steps for safeguarding trade secrets in the world of generative AI Generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) tools pose new risks to a company’s trade secrets. This client update... July 5, 2023 Client Update Navigating generative AI in M&A transactions The recent rise of consumer and market interest in generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools has spurred growing inte... December 7, 2022 Articles & Books Intellectual property at the Supreme Court Davis Polk partner David Lisson and counsel Philip Sheng authored “Intellectual property at the Supreme Court” in the ... October 3, 2022 Client Update IP & Tech Transactions Update - October 2022 Below is our latest report on developments in IP, data privacy and cybersecurity law. In this issue, we discuss the EU’s U... December 30, 2021 Articles & Books What to watch for in 2022: patent litigation Davis Polk partner David Lisson and associate Gareth DeWalt recently authored “What to watch for in 2022: patent litigat... June 28, 2021 Client Update IP & Tech Transactions Update - June 2021 Below is our latest report on developments in IP, data privacy and cybersecurity law. In this issue, we discuss, among oth... June 22, 2021 Client Update Supreme Court preserves inter partes review in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. The Supreme Court yesterday found the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to be unconstituti... Load More
March 14, 2024 Client Update European Parliament approves AI Act On March 13, the European Parliament passed a draft of the Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act includes requirements f...
February 13, 2024 Client Update U.S. Patent Office issues guidance for AI-assisted inventions On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued inventorship guidance for AI-assisted invention...
December 27, 2023 Articles & Books What’s ahead when AI and intellectual property converge Davis Polk partner David Lisson and associate Serge Voronov authored “What’s ahead when AI and intellectual property c...
November 29, 2023 Client Update Three steps for safeguarding trade secrets in the world of generative AI Generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) tools pose new risks to a company’s trade secrets. This client update...
July 5, 2023 Client Update Navigating generative AI in M&A transactions The recent rise of consumer and market interest in generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools has spurred growing inte...
December 7, 2022 Articles & Books Intellectual property at the Supreme Court Davis Polk partner David Lisson and counsel Philip Sheng authored “Intellectual property at the Supreme Court” in the ...
October 3, 2022 Client Update IP & Tech Transactions Update - October 2022 Below is our latest report on developments in IP, data privacy and cybersecurity law. In this issue, we discuss the EU’s U...
December 30, 2021 Articles & Books What to watch for in 2022: patent litigation Davis Polk partner David Lisson and associate Gareth DeWalt recently authored “What to watch for in 2022: patent litigat...
June 28, 2021 Client Update IP & Tech Transactions Update - June 2021 Below is our latest report on developments in IP, data privacy and cybersecurity law. In this issue, we discuss, among oth...
June 22, 2021 Client Update Supreme Court preserves inter partes review in United States v. Arthrex, Inc. The Supreme Court yesterday found the administrative patent judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to be unconstituti...