Industry Mobile Menu Trigger Overview Experience Team Insights Subscribe to insights June 29, 2015 Client Update Third Circuit Holds Non-Cash Consideration – Such As “No Authorized Generic” Agreements – Can Constitute Unlawful “Pay For Delay” First appellate court decision applying FTC v. Actavis (S.Ct. 2013). Court finds rule of reason analysis should be applied... August 24, 2009 Client Update Davis Polk Antitrust Update - August 2009 The federal antitrust regulators, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of...
June 29, 2015 Client Update Third Circuit Holds Non-Cash Consideration – Such As “No Authorized Generic” Agreements – Can Constitute Unlawful “Pay For Delay” First appellate court decision applying FTC v. Actavis (S.Ct. 2013). Court finds rule of reason analysis should be applied...
August 24, 2009 Client Update Davis Polk Antitrust Update - August 2009 The federal antitrust regulators, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of...