CLIENT NEWSFLASH

SEC Staff Alert Reveals Expansive Application
of Market Access Rule

October 6, 2011

A National Exam Risk Alert released by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations reveals that the SEC staff is taking an expansive view of a broker-dealer’s obligations under new Rule 15c3-5, the “Market Access Rule.”  The Alert points to the Market Access Rule as the basis for a broker-dealer’s obligation to monitor an array of risks from offering master-sub account arrangements.  The Alert suggests that the staff of the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) may use the Market Access Rule’s risk management policies and procedures requirements as a basis for enforcing compliance with many other compliance obligations, particularly those involving customer surveillance and diligence.

The Market Access Rule, adopted on November 3, 2010, requires broker-dealers that provide market access to a customer to “establish, document, and maintain a system of risk management controls and supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and other risks” in connection with providing market access.  A Davis Polk Client Memorandum describing the Market Access Rule is available here.

In the Alert, OCIE cautions broker-dealers regarding the special compliance risks associated with offering master-sub account trading arrangements, in which a master account with the firm is subdivided to allow direct trading by others in sub-accounts.  The master account holder may be another broker-dealer, or a partnership that provides its individual partners trading authority over separate sub-accounts.  The broker-dealer offering the master account may not know the identity of each of the sub-account holders.  Because these arrangements may include the broker-dealer providing market access to the master account, which in turn provides market access to the traders in its sub-accounts, OCIE staff believes that many aspects of the arrangement implicate the Market Access Rule. 

The Alert is notable for the breadth of obligations that OCIE staff indicates may fall within the Market Access Rule’s requirement to maintain controls for regulatory requirements in connection with market access.  Apparently, OCIE staff would expect a broker-dealer that provides market access to master accounts to have conducted risk assessments and to maintain risk management controls and supervisory procedures with respect to following regulatory requirements:

  • Know-Your-Customer and Account Diligence.  The Alert indicates that OCIE believes that, in order to comply with the Market Access Rule, firms must conduct diligence as to the persons trading through sub-accounts and understand the relationship between the master account holder and sub-account holders.  OCIE believes that reasonable procedures may include maintaining a list of all authorized traders in each sub-account and verifying each trader’s identity (potentially including fingerprints) as well as conducting interviews and criminal, OFAC and other background checks.  This may present practical difficulties where the holder of the master account is unwilling to provide full information about each of the traders in its sub-accounts, as the traders have no direct relationship with the broker-dealer providing the master account.
  • Insider Trading.  OCIE suggests that, because the Market Access Rule requires controls designed to “prevent the entry of orders” in which the customer “is restricted from trading,” firms must have reasonably designed controls to prevent insider trading.  In addition to surveillance for unusual activity and trading patterns, OCIE suggests that firms should consider appropriate due diligence to determine whether the ultimate customer is an insider of a corporation and may be subject to trading restrictions in the securities of that corporation.
  • Information Security.  OCIE states that the Market Access Rule requires broker-dealers to protect information and information systems “from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, perusal, inspection, recording or destruction.”  This risk may be heightened for firms offering master-sub account arrangements because of the larger number of persons, including potentially unknown persons, with access to the firm’s systems.  OCIE suggests that firms consider adding security parameters such as trader validation requirements, require customers to receive training in the use of the firm’s systems and market trading rules, and requiring master account owners to implement controls to prevent the misuse of the firm’s technology.

Aside from these requirements based on the Market Access Rule, the Alert also cautioned that master-sub account arrangements must be closely monitored due to the added risk the model presents for the detection and prevention of money laundering, market manipulation, excessive leverage and unregistered broker-dealer activity (for example, if a master account holder that is not a registered broker-dealer uses the sub-accounts to effectively offer trading privileges to “customers,” absent an available exemption from registration).

The Alert underscores the uncertain and potentially expanding scope of the Market Access Rule.  Originally proposed as a limited measure to prevent broker-dealers from providing unfiltered naked access to the market, it appears that regulators may apply the Rule’s requirements for risk management controls and procedures as an overlay onto other compliance obligations tangentially related to market access. 

In light of the Alert, broker-dealers should review their Market Access Rule implementation efforts to evaluate whether other possible regulatory risks may be implicated by the Rule.  The SEC announced that the Alert is the first of a series that the staff expects to issue.  It will be important to monitor whether subsequent National Exam Risk Alerts contain substantive interpretations or are limited to highlighting examination priorities.

If you have questions regarding this newsflash, please contact any of the lawyers listed below or your regular Davis Polk contact.

Gerard Citera 212 450 4881 gerard.citera@davispolk.com
Robert L.D. Colby 202 962 7121 robert.colby@davispolk.com
Susan C. Ervin 202 962 7141 susan.ervin@davispolk.com
Annette L. Nazareth 202 962 7075 annette.nazareth@davispolk.com
Lanny A. Schwartz212 450 4174lanny.schwartz@davispolk.com
Zachary J. Zweihorn 202 962 7136 zachary.zweihorn@davispolk.com
Notice: This is a summary that we believe may be of interest to you for general information. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you would rather not receive these memoranda, please respond to this email and indicate that you would like to be removed from our distribution list. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original message, any attachments thereto and all copies. Refer to the firm's privacy policy located at davispolk.com for important information on this policy. Please add Davis Polk to your Safe Senders list or add dpwmail@davispolk.com to your address book.
© 2011 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP