Guidance on Use of Credit Ratings in
Securities Offerings Following Dodd-Frank

July 21, 2010

Among the many provisions contained in The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (signed into law by the President today), is a provision which nullifies Rule 436(g) under the Securities Act beginning tomorrow .  Under Rule 436, if information is included in a registration statement that is prepared or certified by an expert, that expert’s consent must be obtained. Rule 436(g) had provided an exemption for credit ratings provided by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (or “NRSROs”) such that consent was not required even if a rating was included in the registration statement.


Many corporate issuers refer to the ratings of their outstanding debt and preferred securities in the prospectus and prospectus supplements for those securities as well as in their Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q that are incorporated into their registration statements.  The repeal of Rule 436(g) therefore raises certain questions regarding the continued use of ratings information given that certain rating agencies have already indicated that they are currently unwilling to consent and others are expected to take a similar position.


Please click here for a White Paper, prepared by Davis Polk along with several other law firms, after consultation with staff members of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance, which sets forth approaches that we believe are appropriate with respect to the use of NRSRO ratings in offerings of securities.[1]


[1] This white paper does not address asset-backed securities offerings governed by Regulation AB, as Regulation AB requires inclusion of ratings information.


If you have questions regarding this newsflash, please call any of the lawyers listed below or your regular Davis Polk contact.

Julia K. Cowles650 752
Joseph A. Hall212 450
Michael Kaplan 212 450 4111
Richard D. Truesdell, Jr. 212 450
Richard J. Sandler212 450
Notice: This is a summary that we believe may be of interest to you for general information. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you would rather not receive these memoranda, please respond to this email and indicate that you would like to be removed from our distribution list. If you have any questions about the matters covered in this publication, the names and office locations of all of our partners appear on our website,
© 2010 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP