CLIENT NEWSFLASH

U.K. Takeover Panel Consultations July 2012

July 12, 2012

On July 5, 2012, the Code Committee of the U.K. Takeover Panel (the “Panel”) published three Public Consultation Papers (“PCPs”) setting out proposed amendments to the U.K. Takeover Code (the “Code”). The Code sets out binding rules for proposed takeovers of companies and is focused on ensuring a non-coerced choice by shareholders without input by the incumbent board, unlike the typical U.S. approach that permits the incumbent board to act in a manner it believes can best protect shareholders.

Of particular interest are proposals to amend the rules for determining companies that are subject to the Code.  If implemented as proposed, the changes contemplated will have the effect of bringing companies that are not currently subject to the Code within its jurisdiction.

The U.K. government recently announced plans to introduce a binding, three-yearly shareholder vote on the compensation policy of U.K. incorporated, quoted (publicly traded) companies, which include companies listed on the NYSE and NASDAQ, even if not listed in the U.K. (read a recent Davis Polk blog post on this topic here). These latest proposals provide a further reminder that the U.K. applies some, and may be about to apply more, corporate governance and shareholder protection measures which resonate most in the context of publicly traded companies on the basis of location of incorporation rather than location of listing.  This approach is different from that adopted in the U.S., which focuses on the listing location and does not impose its rules on U.S.-domiciled companies not listed on a U.S. exchange, and could lead some U.K. incorporated companies to consider re-domiciling.

Removal of the residency test

Currently, the Code applies to an offer for a public company that has its registered office in the U.K., the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man if it has securities admitted to trading on a regulated market in the U.K. or on a stock exchange in the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.  However, the Code also applies to an offer for a public company that has its registered office in the U.K., the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man and whose securities are not admitted to trading on one of the markets mentioned above if the Panel considers that it has its place of central management and control in the U.K., the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man (the “residency test”). 

Under the proposed amendments, the Code Committee proposes to remove the residency test in its entirety.  As a result, the Code will potentially apply to all offers for public and (subject to certain further criteria)[1] private companies that have their registered offices in the U.K., the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.[2]

By way of practical example, an offer for a public company with its registered office in the U.K. or Jersey, with securities listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ and with its place of central management and control outside the U.K., the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man would, under the new proposals, be subject to the Code, even though that company does not currently meet the residency test.

Other changes

The other two PCPs propose amendments to particular rules in the Code, including those in relation to profit forecasts disclosure, merger benefits statements (to be renamed “quantified financial benefits statements”) and the disclosure of material changes in information published in an offer document, as well as proposals to extend the framework currently provided in the Code for the benefit of the target company’s employee representatives (following Kraft’s takeover of Cadbury) to apply to trustees of the target company’s pension schemes.

Responses to the PCPs are requested by September 28, 2012.


[1] In broad terms, the Code will apply to an offer for a private company if its securities have traded in the U.K., the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man, or if the company has filed a prospectus, in the previous 10 years.

[2] The Code also applies in certain instances of shared jurisdiction. These provisions are not affected by the proposed removal of the residency test and are therefore not considered further.

If you have questions regarding this publication, please contact any of the lawyers listed below or your regular Davis Polk contact.

John Banes
+44 20 7418 1317
john.banes@davispolk.com
Phillip R. Mills
212 450 4618
phillip.mills@davispolk.com
Simon Witty
+44 20 7418 1015
simon.witty@davispolk.com
Dan Hirschovits
+44 20 7418 1023
dan.hirschovits@davispolk.com
Notice: This publication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients and friends of the firm, is for general information only. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you would rather not receive these memoranda, please respond to this email and indicate that you would like to be removed from our distribution list. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original message, any attachments thereto and all copies. Refer to the firm's privacy policy located at davispolk.com for important information on this policy. Please add Davis Polk to your Safe Senders list or add dpwmail@davispolk.com to your address book.

Davis Polk & Wardwell London LLP is a limited liability partnership formed under the laws of the State of New York, USA, and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with registration number 566321.
© 2012 Davis Polk & Wardwell | 450 Lexington Avenue | New York, NY 10017