Client Newsflash

IRS Releases Internal Memorandum Regarding Lending in the United States by Foreign Persons

September 23, 2009

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has released an internal memorandum (the “Memorandum”), from the Office of Chief Counsel to the Director of Field Operations in Manhattan (Financial Services), which concludes that a foreign corporation is engaged in a lending business in the United States because its agent, a separate and possibly unrelated corporation, originates loans in the United States.  Although a Chief Counsel memorandum does not constitute authority on which a taxpayer may rely, it does provide insight into the views of the IRS.  The Memorandum does not provide a detailed analysis of the activities that constitute a lending business, but instead focuses on the attribution of a separate party’s office to a foreign corporation.  It notes, however, that the lending activities at issue were “considerable, continuous and regular.”


In the situation at issue in the Memorandum, a foreign corporation (“Foreign Co”) that has no office or employees in the United States enters into a contract with a United States corporation (“Origination Co”) under which Origination Co, in exchange for arm’s-length fees, provides services in the United States in connection with loans to U.S. borrowers that are funded by Foreign Co.  Origination Co performs all activities necessary to originate the loans, but is not authorized to conclude contracts on behalf of Foreign Co.  Employees of Foreign Co give final approval for the loans, and sign the loan documents on behalf of Foreign Co, outside of the United States.  Foreign Co is organized in a country that does not have an income tax treaty with the United States.  The Memorandum does not disclose whether Foreign Co and Origination Co are related parties.


The Memorandum concludes that Origination Co is acting as the agent of Foreign Co and that, regardless of whether Origination Co is an independent or a dependent agent, its lending activities are attributable to Foreign Co, with the result that Foreign Co is engaged in a trade or business in the United States.  According to the Memorandum, the interest that Foreign Co derives from the loans is “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business under the special rules that determine the portion of interest income that is effectively connected with a banking, financing or similar business conducted through an office in the United States.


Under those rules, if a foreign corporation derives U.S. source interest in the active conduct of a banking, financing or similar business in the United States, the interest will be treated as effectively connected income only if the securities giving rise to the interest are attributable to the U.S. office through which the business is carried on.  The Memorandum states that the U.S. office in question need not be maintained by the foreign corporation.  Specifically, it concludes that rules limiting the circumstances under which the office of an agent can be attributed to its principal, which are applicable for purposes of determining whether foreign source income constitutes effectively connected income, do not apply to the determination whether U.S. source income is effectively connected with a banking, financing or similar business conducted in the United States.


The Memorandum ends with the statement that the IRS understands that non-U.S. persons may be using other strategies to engage in lending activities that give rise to effectively connected income.  It encourages the IRS field agents to develop cases addressing these issues.





If you have questions regarding this newsflash, please call any of the lawyers listed below or your regular Davis Polk contact.

Harry Ballan 212 450 4827
Mary Conway 212 450 4959
Lucy W. Farr 212 450 4026
Rachel D. Kleinberg 650 752 2054


To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, unless explicitly provided otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

     Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Notice: This newsletter is a summary that we believe may be of interest to you for general information. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you would rather not receive these memoranda, please respond to this email and indicate that you would like to be removed from our distribution list. If you have any questions about the matters covered in this publication, the names and office locations of all of our partners appear on our website,
© 2009 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP