CLIENT NEWSFLASH

Update on "Carried Interest" Legislation

May 21, 2010

On May 20, Democratic House and Senate tax writers released a tax extenders package (H.R. 4213) that includes provisions relating to the taxation of carried interest received by investment fund managers.

 

In general, the proposal would tax carried interest (and gain on the disposition of carried interest partnership interests) as ordinary income and as income subject to self-employment taxes.  We described the previous version of the carried interest proposal in a client memorandum dated April 13, 2009, Update on "Carried Interest" Legislation: New Levin Bill and in a client memorandum dated December 9, 2009, House to Consider Bill Containing Carried Interest Proposal, Ban on Bearer Bonds and Updated FATCA Rules.

 

The new version is substantially similar to the version originally proposed by Rep. Levin and passed by the House in December, with the following changes.

  • The most significant change is that, in the case of partners who are individuals, ordinary income treatment and self-employment tax would apply to only 75% of each item of income comprising the carried interest. For taxable years beginning before 2013, the percentage would be 50% instead of 75%.
  • The new version would generally apply to taxable years ending after the date of enactment, which therefore would include calendar year 2010 if the bill were enacted this year.  Pursuant to a special provision, however, the new rules would apply only to partnership income for the post-enactment portion of the year (or, if less, partnership income for the entire enactment year).  In the case of disposition gains, the new proposal would apply only to transactions occurring after the date of enactment.
  • The new version would clarify that gains attributable to a general partner’s own out-of-pocket cash contributions are eligible for capital gain treatment even though those contributions are not subject to management fees or carried interest (and thus are not pari passu with limited partner interests).
  • The new version includes various other technical changes.  Among other things, these changes would:
    • Exclude the disposition of a publicly traded partnership interest by an individual who does not provide investment management services.
    • Exclude the contribution of a carried interest partnership interest to an upper-tier partnership if the contributing partner elects to treat the upper-tier partnership as an investment services partnership interest.

If you have questions regarding this newsflash, please call any of the lawyers listed below or your regular Davis Polk contact.

Harry Ballan 212 450 4827 harry.ballan@davispolk.com
Mary Conway212 450 4959mary.conway@davispolk.com
Rachel D. Kleinberg650 752 2054rachel.kleinberg@davispolk.com
Michael Mollerus212 450 4471michael.mollerus@davispolk.com
William H. Weigel212 450 4628william.weigel@davispolk.com

 

Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or to promote, market or recommend any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Notice: This is a summary that we believe may be of interest to you for general information. It is not a full analysis of the matters presented and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you would rather not receive these memoranda, please respond to this email and indicate that you would like to be removed from our distribution list. If you have any questions about the matters covered in this publication, the names and office locations of all of our partners appear on our website, davispolk.com.
© 2010 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP